 |
| Image source: fujidenshi.co.jp |
Automation greatly reduces the number of people involved in industrial processes. However, does this mean that it’s a safer method of producing goods?
Unlike the legacy systems of yesteryears, today’s automation technology considers risk-assessment in its design to help minimize safety issues. Not only do these machines keep the workplace safe, but they also boost productivity, reduce environmental impact, and diminish downtime.
Fully automated systems are also easier to troubleshoot. Problems are easily diagnosed and fixed as the system relays the information to the controller in a format accessible to the operator, as well as the appropriate action needed to alleviate the problem. This can give workers a fast-enough heads-up if they need to vacate the facility if necessary.
Still, there are concerns with automated systems today that were not present in the old systems. Machine hacking is one of them.
 |
| Image source: cisco.com |
Because a lot of these automated machines are controlled through a network, it is possible for a cybercriminal to infiltrate the network and wreak havoc. They can initiate a handful of attacks such as changing the settings of the robots, manipulate them, or even shut them down. By doing so, they can skew the quality of the product being produced which can endanger consumers. This can also lead to the machine damaging itself, costing millions of dollars in the process. It can even endanger the lives of those operating these machines.
Peter Zieve is an inventor with 23 patents under his name. He is also the CEO of Electroimpact, Inc., a highly-experienced aerospace automation company with an exceptional concentration of engineers. For similar reads, visit this blog.
